Skip to content

RMF and ATO consulting

Move the authorization package without weakening the record.

WTC helps federal and defense teams execute the Risk Management Framework, build defensible Authority to Operate packages, and turn control requirements into evidence an assessor and authorizing official can actually evaluate.

The problem

Where federal cyber programs get stuck.

  • Control statements repeat requirements but never explain implementation, ownership, or evidence.
  • Artifacts exist, but they do not trace cleanly to controls, system boundaries, inherited services, or test results.
  • eMASS records, the SSP, diagrams, hardware and software inventories, and POA&M entries disagree.
  • The package moves through meetings without reaching a clear authorization decision.

What WTC delivers

Work products that survive review.

Every deliverable is built to support a decision, close a documented gap, or make the authorization record more defensible.

01

RMF execution plan

A practical work breakdown tied to categorization, control selection, implementation, assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring.

02

Rev. 5 control implementation

System-specific statements that identify responsible parties, implementation mechanisms, inheritance, evidence, and remaining risk.

03

Authorization artifacts

SSP content, diagrams, inventories, plans, procedures, test results, and decision-support material aligned to the system boundary.

04

eMASS and POA&M discipline

Structured records, evidence references, milestones, owners, dependencies, and risk language that hold together under review.

Engagement model

A disciplined path from signal to proof.

WTC can support a defined work package, strengthen an existing team, or own a focused authorization-readiness effort.

01

Baseline

Confirm the mission, boundary, impact level, authorization strategy, package status, and decision timeline.

02

Trace

Map controls to implementation owners, inherited services, artifacts, tests, findings, and open risk.

03

Close

Resolve material gaps, strengthen weak statements, produce missing evidence, and normalize the package.

04

Prove

Run decision-readiness reviews and leave a coherent record for assessors and the authorizing official.

Best fit for

  • Programs transitioning from NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 to Rev. 5
  • Systems approaching assessment or an authorization decision
  • Teams with stalled, inconsistent, or inherited ATO packages
  • Primes that need experienced RMF execution inside an existing delivery team

Signal received

Bring WTC the hard part.

Tell us what is stalled, exposed, or under pressure. We will help define the next defensible move.

Talk to WTC